Phase 1: Exploration

Identifying human factors and environmental factors before implementing acupuncture or acupressure in a hospital setting.

Bottom Line Before launching any hospital acupuncture programme, you must understand the internal need, the available intervention options, your team composition, staff and patient attitudes, organisational readiness, and funding landscape. Skipping this phase is the most common reason implementations fail.

Prior to implementation, it is necessary to establish a good understanding of the human factors and environmental factors within which the implementation will happen. Factors to be considered are:

Identify Internal Needs

Using PONV (postoperative nausea and vomiting) as example:

How is PONV prevented and managed locally?
Is PONV incidence charted?
What is current PONV incidence and rescue antiemetic usage?
Is PONV risk assessed?

"PONV risk assessment is the first recommendation for PONV management" (Gan 2014). Four primary risk factors identified:

Risk increases 20% per additional factor (Apfel et al., 1999). Patient self-assessment checklist available.

PONV Risk Score

Intervention

Compare the main acupuncture and acupressure modalities below. Expand any row for detailed effectiveness data, advantages, disadvantages, and implementation notes recovered from the legacy POPA4Ease site.

Overview of acupuncture and acupressure modalities
Legacy POPA4Ease overview graphic retained as supporting context, not as the primary interaction.
Modality Invasiveness Evidence Snapshot Cost / Equipment Training Details
Manual Acupressure Non-invasive Practical low-cost option with reduced nausea and vomiting in the legacy source. No equipment Low
View details

Effectiveness

  • Lee et al., 2015: nausea reduced from 45% to 30% (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.62-0.81).
  • Lee et al., 2015: vomiting reduced from 30% to 18% (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.50-0.73).

Advantages

  • Avoids needles
  • Requires no equipment
  • Easily trained staff

Disadvantages

  • Effectiveness varies by practitioner skill
  • Legacy source offered less detail than other modalities
Transcutaneous Electrostimulation Non-invasive Strong non-invasive option with adjustable stimulation and extended-use potential. $40-$200 equipment Moderate
View details

Effectiveness

  • Legacy source describes it as the strongest non-invasive stimulation option.
  • Lee et al., 2015 pooled PC6 evidence: nausea reduced from 45% to 30% and vomiting reduced from 30% to 18%.

Advantages

  • Can be used over extended periods
  • Adjustable intensity
  • Avoids needles

Disadvantages

  • Requires equipment
  • Requires staff training
Auricular Acupuncture Needle-based Procedure-specific evidence in gynaecological surgery and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Few cents per needle or bead Moderate
View details

Effectiveness

  • Huang et al., 2005: effective following gynaecological surgery.
  • Kim et al., 2003: effective following gynaecological surgery.
  • Sahmeddini and Fazelzadeh, 2008: effective following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Advantages

  • Economical
  • Individualized point selection
  • Low risk of misplaced needles
  • Remote from most surgical sites

Disadvantages

  • Requires staff training or a qualified acupuncturist
Body Acupuncture Needle-based Direct body acupuncture with clear reductions in nausea, vomiting, and total PONV. $0.05 per needle Moderate
View details

Effectiveness

  • Lee et al., 2015: nausea reduced from 54% to 29% (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.39-0.80).
  • Lee et al., 2015: vomiting reduced from 41% to 20% (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.34-0.76).
  • Cheong et al., 2013: PC6 plus other acupoints reduced PONV from 21% to 6% (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.17-0.49).

Advantages

  • Economical
  • Individualized point selection
  • Strong reduction when PC6 is paired with additional points

Disadvantages

  • Requires staff training or a qualified acupuncturist
  • Requires monitoring for misplaced needles
Electroacupuncture Needle-based Body acupuncture with adjustable electrical stimulus and reusable stimulation units. $200-$800 equipment plus needles Moderate
View details

Effectiveness

  • Legacy source describes outcomes as equivalent to body acupuncture with easier stimulus control.
  • Cheong et al., 2013 combined-point evidence: PONV reduced from 21% to 6% (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.17-0.49).

Advantages

  • Reusable stimulation units
  • Adjustable intensity
  • Individualized point selection
  • Strong combined-point evidence

Disadvantages

  • Requires staff training or a qualified acupuncturist
  • Requires equipment purchase
  • Requires monitoring for misplaced needles
Acupressure Band or Patch Non-invasive Improves nausea, vomiting, and rescue antiemetic use with low training burden. About $5 AUD Low
View details

Effectiveness

  • Shiao and Dune, 2006: nausea reduced from 36% to 24%.
  • Shiao and Dune, 2006: vomiting reduced from 20% to 15%.
  • Shiao and Dune, 2006: rescue antiemetics reduced from 22% to 13%.

Advantages

  • Extended use
  • No infection risk
  • Flexible delivery
  • Can continue at home

Disadvantages

  • Not suitable for some wrist sizes or injuries
  • Can be awkward with multiple IV or arterial lines
PC6 Acupoint Stimulation (All Modalities) Mixed Strong pooled effect across modalities with mild transient side effects. Varies by modality Moderate
View details

Effectiveness

  • Lee et al., 2015: nausea reduced from 47% to 31%.
  • Lee et al., 2015: vomiting reduced from 33% to 19%.
  • Lee et al., 2015: rescue antiemetics reduced from 33% to 20%.

Advantages

  • Equivalent effectiveness to common antiemetics
  • Mild transient side effects
  • Can be combined with antiemetics for additional benefit

Disadvantages

  • Requires staff training or a qualified acupuncturist

The Team

The Implementation Team

Team composition should include:

Opinion Leaders / Facilitators

"Individuals in an organization who have formal or informal influence on attitudes and beliefs regarding intervention implementation."

Champions

Individuals who "drive through an implementation, overcoming indifference or resistance."

External Change Agents

External individuals who "formally influence or facilitate intervention decisions."

Key principle: Early users should share professional, educational, cultural, or socioeconomic backgrounds with leadership for successful implementation.

Staff

Staff Groups Requiring Involvement
USA Survey Results (Faircloth, 2014)

Respondents: 292 from 1,728 anaesthesia staff across 96 departments.

Composition: 54% anaesthesiologists, 44% nurses, 2% aides.

Main barriers:

Time concern: Only 38% viewed acupuncture as too time-consuming.

Australian Hospital Survey Results

Respondents: 165 doctors, nurses, midwives, obstetricians.

Australian General Practice Context

Readiness for Change

Organizational Readiness Assessment

Tool: Modified Checklist to Assess Organization Readiness (CARI) (Barwick, 2011)

Evaluates:

Scoring: Total possible = 100 points. Readiness threshold: 80+ points (minimum 15 points per category).

CARI Readiness Checklist

Funding

Cost and Funding Considerations

Cost Assessment Framework (Myle, 2016):

Costs to Track:

Assessment Methods:

Cost Comparison

Patient

Patient Perspectives

Patient Survey Results (Weeks et al., 2017):

Sample: 160 surgical patients (Australian).

PONV Management Guideline Recommendation: Interventions should consider patient preferences when selecting treatment approaches.

Phase 1 Resources

Last reviewed: April 2026